Theories of domestic violence Essay Example

Theories of domestic violence Essay There are many different theories as to the causes of domestic force ( maltreatment ) . These include psychological theories that consider personality traits and mental features of the wrongdoer, every bit good as societal theories which consider external factors in the wrongdoer s environment, such as emphasis, societal acquisition and drug and intoxicant maltreatment. Psychological theoriesfocal point on personality traits and mental features of the wrongdoer. Harmonizing to this theoretical attack, features associated with persons who abuse their spouses include low self-esteem, isolation from societal support, a manipulative nature, and a desire for power and control ( Suman Kakar 1998 ) . These persons are likely to be unwilling to take duty for their ain actions, have utmost feelings of green-eyed monster and possessiveness, be excessively dependent on the victim, and/or have certain mental or psychological upsets. We will write a custom essay sample on Theories of domestic violence specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Theories of domestic violence specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Theories of domestic violence specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer An of import facet in the psychological theory is power and control. In some relationships, force arises out of a sensed demand for power and control. This is where the maltreater may utilize force as a scheme to derive or keep power and control over the victim. Abusers may experience the demand to command their spouse because of troubles in modulating choler and other strong emotions, or when they feel inferior to the other spouse in instruction and socioeconomic background. For case, in our society today, adult females have moved off from being merely a homemaker and taken up the function as a calling adult female . No thirster are adult females remaining place and be givening to the house while work forces go out and work. In fact, a batch of adult females have taken over occupations that were antecedently held my work forces ( adult females politicians ) . This has brought about a power battle in the household which frequently leads to domestic differences and maltreatment: S ome work forces with really traditional beliefs still think they have the right to command adult females, and that adult females are non equal to work forces, while adult females on the other manus, are competing for power and control. Stressmay be increased when a individual is populating in a household state of affairs, with increased force per unit areas. Social emphasiss, due to inadequate fundss or other such jobs in a household may farther increase tensenesss. Violence is non ever caused by emphasis, but may be one manner that some ( but non all ) people respond to emphasize. Families and twosomes in poorness may be more likely to see domestic force, due to increased emphasis and struggles about fundss and other facets. Some speculate that poorness may impede a adult male s ability to populate up to his thought of successful manhood , therefore he fears losing award and regard. As a consequence of him non being able to economically back up his married woman, and keep control, he may turn to violence as ways to show maleness. Social acquisition theorysuggests that people learn from detecting and patterning after others behavior. With positive support, the behaviour continues. If one observes violent behaviour, one is more likely to copy it. If there are no negative effects ( e.g. victim accepts the force, with entry ) , so the behavior will probably go on. Oftentimes, force is transmitted from coevals to coevals in a cyclical mode. Harmonizing to Faith St Catherine of the Women s Resource and Outreach Centre in Jamaica, there is a civilization of maltreatment, particularly among the interior metropolis hapless Surveies have found that about one half of opprobrious work forces grew up in places where their male parent or measure male parent was an maltreater. An environment where force is either taught, by illustration, or accepted as normal will form upon a kid s mind. For case, a immature male child may see his male parent come place from work rummy and angry, shouting at his female parent. He watche s his female parent effort to delight and pacify his male parent s bibulous behavior. The immature male child is being taught that force gets consequences. He is developing his ain thoughts about what makes a adult male. hypertext transfer protocol: //books.google.com/books? hl=en A ; lr= A ; id=BPT0HelrVcMC A ; oi=fnd A ; pg=PA201 A ; dq=Social+theories+of+Domestic+Violence A ; ots=9iVvl8_Tpr A ; sig=C9P8UBogyad2RePEnpeTk5JYs7Y # v=onepage A ; q= A ; f=false Drug and/or intoxicant maltreatmentmay be a precursor to domestic force. Substance maltreatment leads to out-of-control behavior. A rummy or high individual will be less likely to command his or her violent urges. However some have argued that maltreaters use drug and intoxicant as an alibi for their action. Yet, intoxicant is an of import hazard factor for spouse maltreatment. Harmonizing to University of the West Indies professor and gender expert in Trinidad, Rhoda Reddock: in Trinidad, many of the most ghastly slayings and sexual force are linked to mental disease brought approximately by drug and intoxicant dependence, severally. Since intoxicant lessenings control and raises the potency for moving on urge, it is non surprising that some feel it can be a accelerator for maltreatment. Often a individual is able to keep control of violent emotions when he is sober, but after a few drinks, he becomes opprobrious. The intoxicant has dulled his marbless and diminished his ability to command his pique. In the Caribbean or more specifically in Barbados, domestic force is going more and more evident in the society. Domestic force is rarely reported in the island, therefore why the true incidence of domestic force is unknown. In November of 2005, harmonizing to The World Health Organization ( WHO ) one adult female in every three ( 3 ) adult females are reported to be sexually abused during childhood or adolescence. The survey revealed that the most common signifiers of force is meted out by loved 1s. As mentioned earlier, domestic force is besides known to be closely linked with drug and intoxicant maltreatment. Harmonizing to Tessa Chaderton-Shaw, director, of the National Council of Substance Abuse ( NCSA ) , There are many cross-cutting issues with substance maltreatment anddomestic force She besides stated that, It can take to isolation, shame, guilt, initial denial, loss of support, low self-pride and a possible for condemnable engagement. Peoples so became more cognizant of Do mestic Violence in the state, and the consciousness has invariably been turning. Even the Barbados Police Force has taken domestic force under more serious consideration and had devised a strategic program to turn to domestic force and cut down its happening, harmonizing to Sergeant David Wiltshire. Wiltshire said that officers were sent to the United States and England for developing to react to domestic force issues. Mentions Theories hypertext transfer protocol: //social.jrank.org/pages/210/Domestic-Violence-Causes-Domestic-Violence.html hypertext transfer protocol: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence # Psychological hypertext transfer protocol: //wost201h_domviol.tripod.com/groupactionproject/id4.html Suman Kakar Condemnable Justice Approaches to Domestic Violence ( 1998 ) . Rhoda Reddock A ; Faith St Catherine hypertext transfer protocol: //www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/AllWoman/html/20061203T000000-0500_116180_OBS_CARIBBEAN_FACES_DOMESTIC_VIOLENCE_CHALLENGE_.asp Barbados A ; Domestic Violence hypertext transfer protocol: //archive.nationnews.com/archive_results.php? mode=allwords A ; IncludeStories=1 A ; numPer=20 A ; start=0 A ; keyword=Domestic+Violence A ; smartText

How to Publish Long-Form Posts on LinkedIn

How to Publish Long-Form Posts on LinkedIn As of January 2015, all members of English-speaking countries have the ability to publish long-form post; shortly thereafter, LinkedIn will be expanding that privilege to all of the languages they support. To create a long-form post once you are given Publishing rights, go to your homepage and click on Write an article: You will arrive at a page where you can create a new post. To publish an article, insert your content, along with images and pertinent links. Over 40,000 long-form posts are published every week. According to a study by OkDork and Search Wilderness, the most successful posts followed these guidelines: Keep your title short and sweet. Titles with more than 40-49 characters can get cut off. Make it visual. Posts with at least 8 images perform 2.4 times better. Dont use videos and other multimedia! This might be surprising, but fewer people view articles that include videos (as opposed to static images, which boost views). Keep it clear. Include subheadings- ideally 5 of them- so your article is easy to read. Maintain a reasonable length. Articles between 1900 and 2000 words are read more often. Go neutral. Posts that were neither positive or negative ranked higher. Articles that met the reading level of an 11-year-old ranked better. Get Likes. The more Likes you have, the more views you will get. Publish on Thursdays. Thursday posts get the most views. Dont pose your title as a question. Titles that contained a question didnt fare as well. Always proofread your article before publishing! Once you click Publish, your post is shared. You can also share your article with your social media networks by clicking the Share button. Another tip, suggested by the Content Marketing Institute, is to send a tweet to Tip@LinkedInPulse with your post to improve the odds a LinkedIn editor will see it and it be published on LinkedIn Pulse. Heres what people in your network will see in their desktop inbox when you post an article: Here is what your post will look like on the homepage of your connections: Each time someone likes or comments on your post, it  is brought to the top of the page again. Your posts will also appear in the Posts section of your profile, just beneath your photo. And they can be searched via the Posts option from the search bar drop-down: Interested readers can click through to the post page where they can then follow you and comment on your article, even if they are not currently in your network. Social media statistics and share buttons above your post allow readers to spread your work beyond LinkedIn! Be sure to utilize keywords in your posts. LinkedIn uses a special algorithm to tag long-form posts into categories called channels and to suggest posts for its members. If your article is tagged, it will appear to LinkedIn members with the most relevant profile content. So do some keyword research for your field, or hire someone to do it for you, and build your posts using SEO practices! You can view all of your published posts from your profile, listed in the Posts section. You may also view them (along with any articles drafts) on your publishing dashboard, where you can measure each articles success by reviewing its stats. For LinkedIn ®s tips and best practices for publishing long-form posts, visit LinkedIns Helps Long-Form Posts on LinkedIn Overview. Have you utilized LinkedIn ®s new long-form post feature? If so, what benefits have you enjoyed? And if not, what are you waiting for? Save Save

In the Shooting Salvationist, David R. Stokes recounts the murder Essay

In the Shooting Salvationist, David R. Stokes recounts the murder trial of fundamentalist clergyman J. Frank Norris. Despite muc - Essay Example The court was told of the Norris’ feuds with the Fort Worth Mayor where the preacher had alleged that the city Mayor was an adulterer. Mayor Meacham swore to his friend, D.E Chipps that, â€Å"something must be done† to stop Norris behavior (Stokes 56). Chipps, a local businessperson, agreed to face up to the preacher to threaten him against tainting the local politicians. On July 17, 1926, Chipps entered Norris office and threatened to kill him if he continued to attack the Mayor. According to an eyewitness, L.H. Nutt, Chipps then appeared to have left the building before storming back with the same threats. Norris was standing in front of his desk where a gun belonging to the guard of the church was kept in a drawer as a ‘safety precaution’. Norris then short Chipps three times and claiming that the attacker was â€Å"stronger and could easily have overpowered† him had the brawl resulted into a physical fight (Stokes 112). The defense team stood it s ground that Norris acted in self-defense. According to Stokes, the defense team insisted that Norris’ popularity, fundamentalism views on modernity and his castigation of local leaders and sinners had attracted many enemies including the Mayor. Stokes and the final verdict seemed to agree that Dr. Frank Norris had not premeditated to murder Chipps. He only feared that the drunkard man endangered his life. To strengthen their case further, the defense team presented evidence of Norris inquiring from Nutt about Chipps identity. The case would have yielded different results had the court been presented with evidence that the preacher indeed had prior acquaintance with the victim. On these grounds, the court appeared to be reluctant to convict Dr. Norris of first-degree murder (Stokes, 34). Previous acquittal of Dr. Norris on arson and perjury also served to strengthen his ‘not-guilty’ plea. The prosecution team tried unsuccessfully to relate the two cases as proof that the preacher was culpable of the murder. This was never going to add weight to the case that was facing public scrutiny like never before in the American justice delivery history. There was an apparent fall-out between the public and the once renowned preacher. This was a weak point in the prosecution team because of the enormous task to proof behind reasonable doubt that it was not acting due to public pressure. Ultimately, this proved to be the breakdown of the trial in Norris favor as prosecution team appeared to be overreached. Stokes blamed both the jury and the prosecution team for the apparent injustice of finding Norris not guilty. The prosecutors could easily have won the case had they charged Norris with second-degree murder. Their overly vicious immovable decision to stage a â€Å"first-degree murder case or nothing† was not justifiable under the overwhelming evidence of the contrary (Stokes 150). The jury on the other hand appeared not to consider the possib ility of advising the prosecutors to reconsider their stand. Their final decision baffled the whole world because the enormity of the case warranted a better rationale for a ‘not-guilty’ verdict. Stokes noted that Norris had â€Å"great gifts and abilities† but he exercised â€Å"coercion, control and manipulation†¦Ã¢â‚¬  to further his cause (Stokes 105). Dr. Norris strongly believed that â€Å"the end always justified the means† as he went to every length, including lying, to expand his doctrine of